In Industrial Development, the New Site Selection Question Isn’t Acreage. It’s Power.
PJM’s capacity shortfall and years-long utility delays are reshaping which industrial sites in New Jersey and Pennsylvania can actually get built on schedule.
PJM, the grid operator serving New Jersey and Pennsylvania, has warned governors of a possible capacity shortfall as early as the 2026/2027 delivery year. Data center growth, warehouse automation, and electrified logistics fleets are pushing demand past what utilities planned for. New Jersey has declared an electricity affordability emergency; Pennsylvania has pushed PJM directly on pricing and reliability.
To most people, that reads as energy policy. For industrial developers, it is a site selection problem.
Why It Matters
Land with good highway access and clean zoning used to be considered ready to build. That alone is no longer enough. Utilities in multiple PJM markets are quoting one- to two-year waits for new service, and even routine upgrades can take close to a year. A site can check every traditional box and still miss a development timeline if the substation feeding it cannot support the load.
That changes underwriting. An 18- to 36-month entitlement-to-delivery schedule used to assume power would show up on request. It increasingly does not. Power availability now belongs earlier in diligence, closer to an environmental review than a routine utility hookup.
What This Means for Development
- Confirm available capacity at the substation level before signing a contract. A broker’s assurance is not a utility commitment.
- Get the utility’s interconnection timeline in writing before underwriting a delivery date.
- Build interconnection lead time into the pro forma. A site needing a service upgrade may carry a year or two of cost before it carries rent.
- Revisit sites passed over for being too far from existing infrastructure. With queues this long, proximity to capacity can outweigh other site advantages.
- Track state-level moves, including New Jersey’s grid acceleration order and Pennsylvania’s negotiations with PJM, for incentives tied to power-ready sites.
- Model rising capacity costs into long-term tenant operating assumptions, not just construction budgets.
What This Means for NJ and PA Industrial Owners
New Jersey and Pennsylvania sit inside the PJM system under the most public strain right now. New Jersey has directed agencies to speed up solar, storage, and grid projects. Pennsylvania has pressed PJM on auction pricing and reliability. The outcome of those efforts will help decide which submarkets become power-advantaged over the next cycle, and which stay hard to build regardless of zoning or tenant demand.
Conclusion
Industrial demand fundamentals in New Jersey and Pennsylvania have not changed. What has changed is which sites can actually deliver power on a schedule that supports development. That belongs in diligence now, not as an afterthought.
Greek Real Estate Partners evaluates industrial sites with the same ownership and execution lens we apply to existing assets, including infrastructure and utility capacity, before capital is committed. For a practical conversation about a development opportunity in New Jersey or Pennsylvania, send us an email or call 732-257-7353.
Read more insights.